Mixing object-oriented and functional programming
有哪些语言可以同时促进面向对象编程和功能编程？我知道任何支持一流函数的语言都可以被认为是功能性的，但是我正在寻找一种专门针对这两种编码风格的语法。
使用这种语言，我想象将所有状态更改隔离到代码的单个部分，让程序的其余部分完全正常工作。一想到它我就垂涎三尺(调试天堂！).
到目前为止，我已经发现了斯卡拉，尽管我只是听说过它(它看起来很神奇)。在这种"混合式"的模式中，有什么大的竞争者吗？
(P)Javascript：OO and functional.(p)
(P)The best known are ocaml and F%35；(which can be vaguely described as ocaml for net).(p)(P)There are many other multi-paradigm languages，like Oz，but they have mostly educatical value.通过对比，Ocaml是非常实际的。It's almost as fast as C and almost as beautiful as Haskell:(p)(P)The popular scripting languages like Python and Ruby let you program in functional style as well.然而，他们并不提供一个强大的设施，即"classical"functional languages(as well as ocaml)have：pattern matching(don't mistake it for regexp)。(p)
- 奥坎
- O'Haskell(and object oriented programming is some possible even in normal haskel)
- 尼莫
- Possibly Newlisp
(P)Also，many scripting languages such as Python，Ruby，Lua，etc.Have this capability，but lack many of the nice features of functional languages such as algebraic data types and pattern matching.(p)
哈斯凯尔：纯粹的功能，几乎没有OO，但是继续，潜水吧。D
斯卡拉：OO和FP的完美混合，可能在10年或2年间超过Java作为JVM上的首要语言。我喜欢它，因为它给Java平台带来了功能性的编程，这是非常迫切需要的。
C：对OO的出色支持，以及更多的功能(已经是一流的功能，我们将看到.NET 4带来的改进)
F：.NET语言是专门为实现功能而构建的，而C语言最初是为面向对象的东西而设计的。
python：非常适合OO，但根本不适合FP
javascript：支持一流的函数，但不是专门为fp设计的，比如scala和f。还是比python imho好一点。
为什么要混合OO和FP？作为踏脚石？
(P)Ocaml and F@35；are the most popular languages that mix oop and fp，as far as I know.(p)(P)大多数语言，像鲁比，MIX功能方案在，但一种人民的荷花，甚至不现实。I find languages like that leave a lot to be desired on the syntax front and such.(p)
(P)(c)35；。这是不可或缺的，它可以是手，但它也有功能性的特征。Lambdas，iterators，and linq are all functional.(p)(P)很可能不会有太多人要求净化，但这是对我的工作。(p)
(P)Javascript，Python，and Ruby could be used that way，but scala bumps up a notch by typing the function statcally and working under JVM.(p)
(P)As long as you don't insist on"prity"，common Lisp supports all your needs.(p)
(P)你真的会问错问题你的问题是对"oo"和"functional"programming之间的区别的奖励。This distinction isn't interest or relevant.事实上，根据"支持第一类功能"的标准，即使Java也是功能性的。(p)(P)但你用"纯粹的功能"打到了头顶上That's the interesting bit.What languages offer you referential transparency and purity like that？嗯，他们中的大多数，如果你真的很关心。但他们并没有多少人实际上保证你的功能是纯粹的。I can only think of a couple of languages that offer you that.(p)(P)他们中的一个是哈斯凯尔In Haskell，you write programs that are purely functional from beginning to end.side-effects are delegated to a data structure called IO，and state is handled by passing it through pure functions or encapsulating it in monds.So you have your"debging head"where only a small portion of your code interactions with global state and the rest of your program is pure，and purity is enforced by the language.(p)
python、javascript、common lisp、ruby、smalltalk、haskell和ocaml，在我的头顶上。这并不是什么异国情调的组合。
(P)I'm wondering why you are looking for a language that specifically encourages mixing it up rather than just doing it any way with a language that does functional programming and oo programming well？它可以通过Python、Ruby、Perl或类似的翻译语言有效地发展。In addition C based oo languages tend to mix pure c with oo features，for example objective C could easily be written in such a way should you choose.(p)(P)Edit：I have been made aware I'm wrong，I've left this answer here incase someone can learn from my mistake-see comments.(p)
(P)鲁比！In Ruby，everything is an object(even literals)，and it also has full functional programming support.(p)